EDITORIALS

Reviving Bobwhite Quail: How Working Lands Are Leading the Way

The northern bobwhite quail, once a staple of American grasslands, has seen its population plummet by over 80% in the past three decades. This decline is primarily due to habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation. However, a concerted effort through the Working Lands for Wildlife (WLFW) program is turning the tide.

What Are the Working Lands for Wildlife Program?

Launched in 2012, WLFW is a voluntary conservation initiative under the Farm Bill. It empowers farmers, ranchers, and landowners to implement wildlife-friendly practices on their working lands. By collaborating with state agencies, conservation groups, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), WLFW aims to conserve priority species without hindering agricultural productivity.

Bobwhite Quail: An Indicator Species

Bobwhite quail are considered “edge” species, thriving in areas where grasslands meet forests or croplands. They require a mix of grassy cover and forbs for food, shelter, and protection. The WLFW Bobwhite Initiative, active since 2017, focuses on restoring these habitats to support quail populations. The initiative has expanded to 24 states, with a goal to conserve 7 million acres of bobwhite habitat by 2026.

Conservation Practices in Action

The WLFW program employs a range of habitat restoration techniques:

  • Invasive Species Management: In states like Kansas, removing invasive trees from native grasslands helps restore open habitats for quail.
  • Brush Management and Timber Thinning: In Georgia and South Carolina, these practices promote healthy forest stands, providing essential brooding, nesting, and winter habitats.
  • Easement Agreements: Securing land through conservation easements ensures long-term protection of critical habitats.

These efforts not only benefit bobwhite quail but also enhance biodiversity, improve water quality, and sequester carbon. Additionally, they offer economic advantages to landowners by reducing input costs and increasing yields.

Looking Ahead

The success of the WLFW Bobwhite Initiative underscores the importance of collaborative, landscape-scale conservation. By integrating wildlife habitat restoration into working landscapes, the program demonstrates that conservation and agriculture can go hand in hand. As the initiative progresses, it serves as a model for future conservation efforts, ensuring that species like the bobwhite quail continue to thrive in America’s heartland.

For more information on the WLFW program and how to get involved, visit the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership’s website.

Continue Reading

Elk in the East: A Remarkable Conservation Comeback

Once nearly extinct in the eastern United States, elk have made a remarkable return to the Appalachian region, thanks to dedicated conservation efforts. In the 1990s, Tennessee and Kentucky initiated reintroduction programs, releasing elk into the Cumberland Plateau’s reclaimed mine lands. These areas, once barren, have transformed into thriving habitats for elk, demonstrating the power of habitat restoration in wildlife conservation.

The success of these programs is evident in the flourishing elk populations across the region. In Tennessee, the North Cumberland Wildlife Management Area has become a hotspot for wildlife enthusiasts, offering opportunities to observe elk in their natural habitat. Similarly, Kentucky’s elk herds have expanded, with the state now boasting one of the largest elk populations in the eastern U.S.

Collaborations between state agencies, conservation organizations, and local communities have been instrumental in this success. The Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) and The Nature Conservancy have played pivotal roles in monitoring elk populations, managing habitats, and ensuring sustainable coexistence between elk and human activities. These partnerships highlight the importance of collective action in achieving conservation goals.

The return of elk to the Appalachians is not just a triumph for wildlife but also for local communities. Ecotourism has flourished, with visitors drawn to the region’s natural beauty and the chance to witness elk in the wild. This influx of tourists has provided economic benefits, supporting local businesses and fostering a deeper appreciation for the area’s ecological heritage.

Relevant Reading | What’s In A Name? A Closer Look At The North American Model Of Wildlife Conservation

However, the journey is ongoing. Continuous monitoring and adaptive management are essential to address challenges such as disease management, human-wildlife conflicts, and habitat preservation. The presence of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in some elk populations underscores the need for vigilant health surveillance and proactive measures to mitigate its spread.

The story of elk’s return to the eastern U.S. serves as a testament to the resilience of nature and the effectiveness of collaborative conservation efforts. It underscores the significance of restoring native species and habitats, not only for ecological balance but also for the cultural and economic well-being of communities. As we look to the future, the continued success of elk reintroduction in the Appalachians will depend on sustained commitment, informed management, and a shared vision for a harmonious coexistence between wildlife and people.

Continue Reading

Sheep Grazing Threatens Bighorns, Court Says

In a major win for wildlife conservation, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the U.S. Forest Service’s approval of domestic sheep grazing in Colorado’s Rio Grande National Forest. The court found that the Forest Service violated federal law by downplaying scientific evidence that showed grazing posed a serious disease risk to wild bighorn sheep – an iconic and vulnerable species in the Rocky Mountain West.

At the center of the case was the Wishbone Allotment, a grazing area greenlit in 2018 despite warnings from government scientists years earlier. Studies in 2013 and 2015 flagged domestic sheep as a high-risk source of fatal pathogens – specifically Mannheimia haemolytica and Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. These bacteria, which typically do not harm domestic sheep, can be devastating to wild bighorn populations. Infected bighorns can suffer pneumonia outbreaks that wipe out large portions of herds, sometimes resulting in long-term population collapse.

The court concluded that the Forest Service failed to follow its own risk assessments and misrepresented the potential for disease transmission. Conservation groups, including Western Watersheds Project and WildEarth Guardians, argued that the agency manipulated the science to justify continued grazing, endangering not only the bighorns but the ecological balance of the region.

This legal decision reinforces a broader truth: land management decisions must be grounded in credible science, not political or economic convenience. Public lands serve as habitat for countless native species, and decisions made today will echo for decades across ecosystems.

The ruling also reflects the power of environmental advocacy and legal oversight. Without the persistence of conservation groups and the backing of the judicial system, the risks to bighorn sheep may have gone unchecked. This isn’t just a victory for a single species – it’s a step toward more responsible stewardship of public lands.

Relevant Reading | The What And Why Of Wildlife Harvesting

Colorado’s Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep are not only a symbol of the state’s natural heritage but also a vital part of the local ecosystem. They deserve protection from preventable threats, especially those stemming from conflicting land uses like livestock grazing.

This case serves as a reminder that conservation isn’t passive – it requires active defense against short-sighted policy decisions. As we look toward the future, ensuring that public land policies are shaped by evidence and ecological integrity is crucial.

Wildlife and wild places can’t speak for themselves. Thankfully, in this case, the court did.

Continue Reading

Axis Deer and Hawaii’s Conservation Struggle

Hawaii’s delicate ecosystems are under serious threat from a fast-growing population of invasive Axis deer (Axis axis). Originally introduced to Maui in 1959 for hunting, these animals have multiplied rapidly due to the absence of natural predators. What started as a controlled introduction has now turned into a full-blown crisis, causing widespread damage to both the environment and agriculture.

Environmental Fallout

Axis deer aren’t picky eaters – they consume everything from native plants to crops, stripping the land bare as they go. This constant overbrowsing has led to the decline of native forests, increased soil erosion, and the spread of invasive plant species. In places like Kahikinui on Maui, the situation is especially dire: native understory plants are vanishing, and their disappearance is making it easier for diseases like Rapid ʻŌhiʻa Death – a fungal infection devastating ʻōhiʻa trees – to spread. On top of that, the deer’s feeding habits are preventing forest canopy species from regenerating, threatening the long-term health of Hawaii’s ecosystems.

Impact on Agriculture and Local Economies

The problem doesn’t stop with the environment. Axis deer are wreaking havoc on agriculture too. Farmers and ranchers are reporting serious losses as the deer devour crops and compete with livestock for limited forage. In times of drought, the issue gets even worse – the deer venture into residential and farming areas in search of food and water, intensifying the pressure on already strained resources. For many landowners, the cost of dealing with the damage is becoming unsustainable.

Difficulties in Control

Managing the axis deer population is no easy task. Experts estimate that about 18,000 deer need to be removed every year just to keep the population from growing – a number far beyond what current efforts are achieving. While hunting and fencing have been used as control methods, they haven’t been enough. Fencing can work in small, specific areas but is expensive and hard to implement across Hawaii’s rugged and varied terrain. Meanwhile, the deer are proving highly adaptable, making eradication a huge challenge.

Community Action and Partnerships

Recognizing the growing threat, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) has teamed up with the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to tackle the issue. Together, they’ve opened up lands traditionally reserved for building homes for Native Hawaiians to legal hunting. This allows more targeted population control while giving communities a chance to reclaim damaged land. Residents have been vocal about the toll the deer have taken, and this partnership is a step toward restoring both the land and cultural values tied to it.

Relevant Reading | The Tough Choices Of Saving Wildlife

The Bigger Picture

The axis deer crisis in Hawaii is a clear example of how introducing non-native species can spiral out of control. It’s also a lesson in the importance of ongoing, science-based management and meaningful community involvement. Conservation can’t succeed in a vacuum – it has to be rooted in collaboration, cultural awareness, and long-term thinking.

Continue Reading
Pronghorn Antelope

The Pronghorn Antelope Path: Securing Success in Wyoming

Wyoming’s pronghorn antelope, renowned as North America’s fastest land mammals, undertake a remarkable 200-mile migration each spring and fall between Grand Teton National Park and the Green River Valley. This journey, the longest terrestrial migration in the contiguous United States, is fraught with challenges. Pronghorns must navigate rough terrains, scale elevations, and cross water bodies, all while contending with human-made obstacles such as highways, subdivisions, and private ranchlands. These bottlenecks significantly hinder their migration, threatening their survival and the ecological balance of the region.

Pronghorn Antelope Conservation Efforts: Protecting Critical Habitat

Recognizing the urgency of preserving the pronghorn antelope migration route, The Conservation Fund, in collaboration with various partners, has taken decisive action. A pivotal initiative involved securing a 3,409-acre conservation easement on the Carney Ranch, a significant bottleneck in the pronghorns’ path. This easement ensures that the land remains undeveloped, preserving a critical segment of the migration corridor. The project was made possible through funding from the Acres for America program, a partnership between Walmart and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, along with contributions from the Jonah Interagency Office, Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative, Wyoming Wildlife & Natural Resources Trust, and The Nature Conservancy, supported by a grant from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation. The Carney family also made a substantial donation to the project, underscoring their commitment to conservation. 

Pronghorn Antelope Ecological Significance of the Protected Land

The conserved land is situated within the southern part of the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, an area of immense ecological importance. It serves as a vital link between the Bridger-Teton National Forest and other protected areas, facilitating wildlife movement and genetic exchange. The property boasts diverse habitats, including 25 glacial-pothole wetland ponds and over two miles of Green River frontage. These features provide seasonal habitats for various species, including elk, moose, mule deer, greater sage grouse, and trumpeter swans.

Pronghorn Antelope Legacy and Future Outlook

John Carney, President of the Carney Ranch Company, reflects on the family’s long-standing commitment to the land: “Our family has watched the pressures of civilization impact this valley since 1963. The persistent effort of The Conservation Fund has helped our large extended family to realize my parents’ dream to preserve this beautiful place. We are grateful to be able to leave this ranch as part of our legacy for the future.” 

This conservation success story highlights the importance of collaborative efforts in preserving critical wildlife corridors. By protecting the pronghorn antelope’s migration path, we not only ensure the survival of this iconic species but also maintain the ecological integrity of one of America’s most cherished landscapes.

Relevant Reading | What Are Three Ways To Improve Wildlife Conservation?

 

Continue Reading

Rewilding the UK: Bringing Back the Elk

In a groundbreaking conservation effort, wildlife experts in the East Midlands are working to reintroduce the Eurasian elk to the UK for the first time in approximately 3,000 years. This ambitious project, led by the Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Wildlife Trusts, has secured £15,000 in funding from Rewilding Britain to conduct feasibility studies on the elk’s return.

The Role of Elk in Ecosystems

Elk are considered “keystone” species due to their significant impact on the environment. Historically, they roamed across the UK, particularly in wetlands like the Trent, reed beds, pools, woods, and grasslands. Their presence helped maintain diverse habitats for various species. However, they were hunted to extinction during the Neolithic era.

Challenges and Public Engagement

One of the primary challenges is public perception. Many people are unfamiliar with the idea that elk were once native to the UK. To address this, the project plans to engage with local communities through consultations and educational initiatives. Drawing inspiration from the successful reintroduction of beavers, the team aims to inform and excite residents about the elk’s return.

Health and Safety Considerations

A crucial aspect of the project is ensuring that the reintroduced elk do not pose health risks to existing livestock. The funding will support disease risk assessments to study potential interactions between elk and local animals. This proactive approach aims to prevent any adverse effects on agriculture and local ecosystems.

Looking Ahead

The reintroduction of elk is part of a broader movement towards rewilding, which seeks to restore natural habitats and biodiversity. By reintroducing species like the elk, conservationists hope to create more resilient ecosystems that can support a wide range of wildlife. While challenges remain, the project represents a hopeful step towards restoring the UK’s natural heritage.

The effort to bring elk back to the UK highlights the importance of rewilding in modern conservation strategies. Through careful planning, community involvement, and scientific research, the project aims to restore a piece of the UK’s natural history and promote a healthier environment for future generations.

Continue Reading

Subsistence Use: The What, Where and Why

When we think of feeding ourselves, our minds likely conjure images of suburban comforts. Colorful supermarket aisles under fluorescent lights humming to the soft chirps of checkout scanners or even bustling farmers markets brimming with stands of homegrown products. Regardless of the scene that comes to mind, one we may be less familiar with is the bountiful land around us and all it can bring to the table.

Why Subsistence Hunting? And What is it?
In contrast to the curated aisles of the supermarket, nature is filled with wild unpredictability that many communities around the world have relied on for generations to feed themselves. Along with gathering edible plants, berries and grains from the local environment, subsistence hunting plays a critical role in the lives of rural and indigenous communities, providing an invaluable source of essential nutrition and a vehicle for the transmission of cultural values, stories and identities. But what exactly does subsistence hunting mean?

In different corners of the globe, the hunting of animals is a necessary task to provide food and resources to the hunter, their family and members of the community. This act, called subsistence hunting, becomes especially important in rural areas where access to other means of finding food and services are limited in comparison to more urbanized locations.

Who Does it? And Where?
Subsistence hunting has been central to the identities of many societies for generations, allowing people to maintain ties to their traditions and spiritualities with a greater sense of self. Subsistence hunting is not for the acquisition of commercial gain through economic trade, but rather to sustain the health and vitality of local communities who have a culturally rich history of coexisting alongside the animals with whom they share the land.

A narwhal (Inuktitut: tuugaalik, qilalugaq, or qilalugaq qernertaq) is prepared to eat. Photograph: jbutcher

How is the Animal Used? What Does it Mean for Human and Wildlife Populations?
Typical of subsistence harvests, as much of the animals are used as possible. Harvested meat provides essential nutrients that help form a healthy diet, parts such as bones and teeth are key materials for handmade goods and tools whereas furs and hides can provide necessary protection like clothing and shelter, all of which support families and draw community members closer to one another. Subsistence hunts are often communal, with hunters generally taking only what they need.

To understand the link between hunting and its effects on wildlife further, it’s good to know the effect it has on communities too. The strong sense of appreciation for wildlife among members of a society can work to ensure the continuation of sustainable harvesting. Additionally, indigenous societies and conservationists can work collaboratively to determine what wildlife management strategies might be needed to benefit the animals that have shaped the human cultures that rely on them. By understanding the importance of wildlife to human livelihoods in rural areas, wildlife is held in high regard and protected with the strength of generations.

A Cautionary Note
Subsistence hunting plays an important role in indigenous ways of life but like most things, it’s not always perfect. In terms of wildlife conservation, the effects of poorly managed subsistence hunting can have negative impacts on wildlife populations and diversity. This potential threat can grow larger as humans and their settlements expand in rural areas which can result in increased use of wildlife. The effects can ripple through the ecosystem and even back to humans, negatively impacting the availability of food and their livelihoods.

A man cooks harvested meat by the fire. Photograph: Zambian Department of National Parks and Wildlife

As found in a recent study, unsustainable harvests don’t affect all wildlife the same way or at the same time. Researchers found that species that live longer and reproduce at an older age are affected the most by unsustainable subsistence hunting, as it takes longer for populations of these species to increase. Additionally, the study also found that animals harvested for subsistence were more likely to have long-term decreasing populations, not a positive sign for the hunter or the hunted.

How to Make it Sustainable
Along with identification of the threats to wildlife from poorly regulated subsistence hunting, researchers also indicated some hopeful possibilities for change and positive current states of these harvests worldwide. For some areas, they suggested implementing “no-take zones,” or areas that act as reserves for the animals with the intent to encourage population growth and replenish areas where animals were harvested. Their research also found that subsistence hunting was most sustainable in areas of low human densities, when the hunters used traditional weapons that slowed the pace of harvesting and when there were already local regulations to harvesting, either limiting the number of animals available to take or establishing seasons when subsistence hunting can occur.

A polar bear skin is hung to dry. Photograph: Danita Delimont

The key is to balance the amount of harvests by humans with wildlife population growth to make sure that harvests are sustainable. Similarly, it’s important that any adjustments to harvest levels use a combination of scientific and local knowledge to ensure that suggestions to subsistence harvesting are truly long-lasting to all parties, adapting to the unique issues of each community and satisfying the needs of the context-dependent scenarios of wildlife management across the globe.

To ensure that wildlife and the cultures that depend upon it continue to thrive, subsistence harvesting needs to be managed sustainably. If not, the very species that people rely on to live could be lost, drastically impacting the affected communities and the environments they call home. And though the circumstances may vary and can shape what sustainable options could be for each instance of subsistence harvesting, the importance of subsistence hunting to cultures worldwide that rely on it should be recognized so that the wildlife and the benefits they provide to societies can thrive.

Continue Reading