In the early 20th century, North America’s wildlife populations were in serious decline. Species like wild turkeys, white-tailed deer, elk, and pronghorn antelope had been pushed to the brink, largely due to unregulated land use, habitat loss, and overexploitation. With ecosystems unraveling, something needed to change – and fast.
Enter the Pittman–Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act, at the request of sportsmen, that was then passed by Congress in 1937. This legislation created federal excise tax on firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment into a dedicated funding stream for state-led wildlife conservation. It wasn’t just a new law – it was a game-changing model of self-sustaining environmental funding that still powers conservation efforts nearly 90 years later.
Here’s how the Act works: instead of going into the U.S. Treasury, revenue from the excise tax goes directly into the Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Each year, these funds are distributed to state wildlife agencies using a formula based on state land area and the number of licensed participants. To receive the funds, states must match 25% of the cost of approved projects – ensuring they have real skin in the game.
So where does the money come from?
The tax rates are:
- 11% on long guns, ammunition, and archery gear
- 10% on handguns
In 2021, excise tax revenue came roughly from:
- Handguns: 34%
- Ammunition: 30%
- Firearms: 29%
- Archery equipment: 7%
Surprisingly, around 74% of these funds are generated by people who don’t actually participate in field sports, proving this funding model benefits everyone – even those who don’t directly engage with wildlife.
Where does the money go?
- 79% supports habitat restoration, research, and species recovery
- 20% funds education and safety programs
- The remaining 1% is allocated to special or multi-state projects
To date, over $16.9 billion has been invested through the program. In 2023 alone, states and territories received a record $1.2 billion to support conservation work.
The results? Undeniable. Wild turkey numbers, for example, have increased from just 30,000 in the 1930s to over 7 million today. White-tailed deer and elk have also rebounded from historical lows to stable or growing populations. Return-on-investment analyses estimate conservation gains to be 8 to 16 times greater than the cost.
RELEVANT READING | Hunting + Fishing = Biodiversity–Amplifying the voices and impacts of American sportsmen and women through ‘30 by 30’ policy initiatives
Takeaway: The Pittman–Robertson Act proves that smart, sustainable funding can reverse wildlife declines. It’s not just a tax – it’s one of the most effective conservation tools ever created, quietly generating over a billion dollars annually for the protection and recovery of wildlife across the U.S.